How a purchasing office in China should be organized
2013.08.22
From my observations, procurement offices and trading companies that are based in China tend to make the same mistakes. In this article I will explain how they should be organized.
The traditional organization
• Some purchasers face the suppliers;
• Some English-speaking salespeople face customers (or their head office).
Apart from a few managers, no one knows the buying AND the selling price. It is the whole point of cutting the organization in two.
Downsides of the traditional organization
• The organization is composed of specialists, each group working in its own functional siloes. It means communication is difficult.
• Nobody who is responsible for a supplier’s overall behavior (reliable quality, respect of timing, no last-minute price increases…).
• The purchasers’ work is insufficiently supervised, and kickbacks are common.
A better buying organization
• A few inspectors work ONLY on that team’s orders.
• Merchandisers spend 1-2 days a week in factories, together with inspectors.
Advantages of this organization
• The team leader has ownership over the supplier’s relationship, and is more likely to exert pressure when necessary.
• When an inspector reports that the factory is rushing production, and when the customer is flexible with dates, the team leader can decide to ask the supplier to proceed at a normal pace and to ensure quality is satisfactory.
• Communication is much easier and faster.
• Every decision is taken in a more open manner, and kickbacks become less common.
• The staff is more flexible. Merchandisers can help check quality when too many shipments are ready at once and inspectors can’t follow that schedule.
• Hopefully these small teams can self-manage after some time, rather than constantly asking the boss for small decisions.
Note that an even better organization would gather these merchandisers and inspectors with designers and engineers.